Create webhook
The address Linear delivers Issue and Comment events to.
POST /v1/provider/linear/webhook
| Address | https://api.hanzo.ai/v1/provider/linear/webhook |
| Method | POST |
| Operation | post_provider_linear_webhook |
| Auth | Authorization: Bearer $HANZO_API_KEY |
The address Linear delivers Issue and Comment events to. An issue event is mirrored into the native todo — idempotently by identifier, so ENG-123 is one row however many times it is edited, moved or closed — and every issue and comment event is handed to the automations engine as a verified trigger, which is how an org runs an agent when an issue is assigned to it or a comment mentions it. A remove is never propagated: the native side is canonical.
It answers a benign 200 for what it does not act on — an unknown organization, other event types — so Linear does not retry-storm. A bad signature and a delivery older than a minute are 401; only a sink failure is 502.
The delivery names its Linear organization; that organization's own webhook secret — sealed at /v1/provider/linear/claim — verifies the HMAC over the raw body, so the tenant is the organization the signature proves, never a header.
The caller here is the PLATFORM, not a Hanzo tenant, so there is no bearer and no principal. The signature check IS the authentication, and it fails closed. The tenant is never read from the payload either: it is resolved from the verified platform identifier through the connection map, so an event from a workspace nobody connected does nothing. Refusals are written with their own status rather than being flattened to a 500, so a rejected signature reads as 401 and a malformed body as 400.
Request
The document declares no body for POST /v1/provider/linear/webhook. The handler is typed in cloud but its shape is not yet emitted, so the fields are not listed here — ask MCP's describe for post_provider_linear_webhook, which answers from the running route.
Response
The document declares no response body for this operation. It answers 200 on success and the platform error shape on failure — see Errors.
Examples
hanzo provider linear webhookimport { Configuration, ProviderApi } from 'hanzoai';
const api = new ProviderApi(new Configuration({ accessToken: process.env.HANZO_API_KEY }));
const { data } = await api.postProviderLinearWebhook();from hanzoai.cloud import ApiClient, Configuration
from hanzoai.cloud.api import ProviderApi
client = ApiClient(Configuration(access_token=os.environ["HANZO_API_KEY"]))
result = ProviderApi(client).post_provider_linear_webhook()cfg := hanzoai.NewConfiguration()
cfg.AddDefaultHeader("Authorization", "Bearer "+os.Getenv("HANZO_API_KEY"))
client := hanzoai.NewAPIClient(cfg)
resp, _, err := client.ProviderAPI.PostProviderLinearWebhook(context.Background()).Execute()
if err != nil {
return err
}use hanzo_client::apis::{configuration::Configuration, provider_api};
let mut cfg = Configuration::new();
cfg.bearer_access_token = std::env::var("HANZO_API_KEY").ok();
let result = provider_api::post_provider_linear_webhook(&cfg, Default::default()).await?;import ai.hanzo.cloud.ApiClient;
import ai.hanzo.cloud.api.ProviderApi;
ApiClient client = new ApiClient();
client.setBearerToken(System.getenv("HANZO_API_KEY"));
var result = new ProviderApi(client).postProviderLinearWebhook();The method above is the one at the current release of the document. [email protected] (npm) was generated from an earlier release, where this operation carried a different id, so it spells the method differently — regenerating the clients is what makes the two agree. SDKs →
curl -X POST https://api.hanzo.ai/v1/provider/linear/webhook \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $HANZO_API_KEY"MCP declares no tool for provider — tools/list on https://api.hanzo.ai/v1/mcp names the products it does reach. Use HTTP or an SDK.
How is this guide?